Week Eleven - Leadership Processes and Organizational Change

Changes in organizations can happen naturally (such as growth in a new business), or they can be planned to improve productivity/effectiveness.  However, if planned change is not communicated effectively to all members of an organization, it can have unexpected changes which can, at times, lead to problems. 

Furthermore, people react differently to change.  This can largely depend on the schema they have about the workings of an organization and how change should happen.  A schema is “an organized network of already-accumulated knowledge” (Kring, Johnson, Davison & Neale 2010, p. 46).  For example, when a person sees a line-up, their schema of line-ups tells them to stand at the back of the line. 

Common problems in change processes include poor management support, forced change from the top, inconsistency, unrealistic expectations, lack of participation, poor communication, and ambiguity in purposes and roles (Miller 2009).

For change to be successful, communication is vital.  Different ways change is communicated from management are shown in the below chart.

However, there is also unplanned change which can result from natural disasters to human error.  This forced, unexpected and sudden change can often lead to crises.  As stated by Wang (2008), many organizations are unprepared for crisis situations and need human resource development to help members within organizations prepare for them.

During times of change, it is important to have a leader who communicates well and leaves little or no confusion as to purposes, roles, and the changes themselves.  Apart from the necessary skill of communication, people have different ideas as to what makes an effective leader.  This was demonstrated during the tutorial (week 12) in which a list of 43 values relating to leadership was provided to us, and we had to choose five that we believed most important.  Together the class chose 21 values. 

In the complex world of organizations, it seems that it will always be impossible to please everybody.  However, in times of change (specifically), it is necessary to have a skilled leader in communication.

References

Kring, A, Johnson, S, Davison, G & Neale, J 2010, Abnormal Psychology, 11^th ed. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken.

Miller, K 2009, Organizational communication: approaches and processes, 6th ed, Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.

Wang, J 2008, 'Developing organizational learning capacity in crisis management', Advances in developing human resources, vol. 10, no. 3, p 425-445.

Week Ten - Conflict Management Processes

To demonstrate how conflict can be managed, we had to act as the mediator of a work conflict as detailed in the case study ‘The Problem with Teamwork’ (Miller 2009) in the tutorial (in week 11).  Our job as mediator was not to make decisions (as would be if we were arbitrators), but to help those in conflict communicate and together resolve their issues, providing guidance where necessary (Dana 1982).

Conflict in organizations can be broken down into incompatible goals, interdependence and interaction (Miller 2009).  It can be seen within groups, between groups, between individuals, or between organizations, and can cause short- and long-term complications within organizations.  Common strategies to manage conflict involve avoiding the situation, accommodating (letting the other side have their way), compromising (sharing the problem), and collaborating (working together to find an optimal solution for all parties involved) (Miller 2009).  Furthermore, it has been argued that responsive leadership and employee participation in decision-making helps to avoid worker-management conflict (Morrill & Rudes 2010).

Bargaining and negotiating are two other popular ways to manage conflict.  These are often more formal and may be vocalized through chosen leaders of a group.  They can aim to maximize one’s own gain (distributive bargaining), or the gains of both parties (integrative bargaining).

Conflict management can be influenced by one’s perceptions of the conflict and the positions of those around them (including themselves), and relationships with others (this can be linked to critical approaches (week seven) which demonstrates the importance of power in relationships).  It can further be influenced by cultural factors (discussed in week six) which can lead to unsuccessful management of conflict due to different approaches being introduced in the one conflict.

Understanding how to manage conflict is vital in understanding communication in organizations today, and especially vital if hoping to work as a communication professional in the future.

References

Dana, D 1982 ‘Mediating interpersonal conflict in organizations: Minimal conditions for resolution’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp.11-16.

Miller, K 2009, Organizational communication: approaches and processes, 6th ed, Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.

Morrill, C & Rudes, DS 2010, 'Conflict resolution in organizations', Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 627-651.

Week Nine - Decision Making Processes

Some forms of decision making are:

The Normative Model

Those at the top of the hierarchical structure formulate the problem, develop a concept, detail their options, evaluate this detail, and then implement the best solution.

Satisficing

Finding a solution that will suffice rather than finding the optimal solution (which is time consuming).

Intuition

Using intuition in times when quick decision making is necessary.

Decisions are often made in small groups using the phase model of decision making (Miller 2009).  This involves getting to know each other and learning of the problem at hand (orientation), discussion of possible solutions (conflict), arriving at a consensus (emergence), and supporting of the decision by the whole group (reinforcement).  However, this model suggests there is always structure and logic used.

The worst thing that can happen in decision-making in small groups is groupthink.  This is when people in decision-making groups choose unanimity over discussing all and any problems to ensure the best decision is made (Callaway & Esser 1984).  The case study ‘The Cultural Tale of Two Shuttles’ (mentioned in week five) is a perfect example.  With the goal of launching on time and keeping the media/public happy, NASA ignored concerns, stereotyped those with concerns as unacceptable, and created an illusion of unanimity by suppressing doubts.

It has been suggested that participation in decision-making can improve job satisfaction (Jackson 1983).  This has led to two models:

Affective Model

This model suggests that the simple act of involving a subordinate in decision-making will boost their esteem and self-actualization needs (seen in Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs – Week 4); therefore increasing satisfaction and productivity (Miller 2009).

Cognitive Model

This model stresses the importance of upward and downward flows of information by showing that subordinates (who are closer to the work) can give important information which affects decision-making.  Also, through the subordinates’ participation in decision-making, implementation of decisions becomes easier.

Participation in decision-making greatly reflects ideas of human relations and human resources approaches (week four) which aim to improve employee satisfaction and productivity.  However, as seen in the case study in week four, problems can arise in participative decision-making if employees feel their ideas will not be utilized, they are unsure that the extra effort is worth it (as shown in studies by Scott-Ladd & Marshall 2004), or don’t like to be doing what they consider to be the manager’s job.

This history and the linking of these approaches is important in understanding communication today.

References

Callaway, MR & Esser, JK 1984, ‘Effects of cohesiveness and problem-solving procedures on group decision making', Social behavior and personality, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 157-164.

Jackson, SE 1983, 'Participation in decision making as a strategy for reducing job-related strain', Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 3-19.

Miller, K 2009, Organizational communication: approaches and processes, 6th ed, Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.

Scott-Ladd, B, Marshall, V 2004, 'Participation in decision making: A matter of context?', Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 646-662.

Week Eight - Socialization Processes

Socialization processes are those processes which help an individual to adapt into a new organization.  Similarly new employees may use the individualization process to adapt by making changes to better suit them.

The basic stages of the socialization process include the ideas we have before entering a new organization (anticipatory socialization), the sensemaking and understanding we go through once we enter the organization (encounter), and adjusting to fit into the organization (metamorphosis).  This last stage has multiple stages within it to help complete this process including training, mentoring, interviewing, research, and relationship building.

This can be demonstrated through the case study “The Church Search” in Miller (2009) explored in the tutorial. Marsha is looking for a job as a pastor at a church, and wants to find one that fits her values and skills.  From church profiles, Marsha enters into the anticipatory stage when she likes the look of a church because it is small and seems to hold similar values to her.  She then enters the encounter stage when being interviewed by Nancy who informs her of the details of her new schedule.  Finally we must assume that she enters the metamorphosis stage when the church helps her to integrate into the community.

The socialization process stresses the importance of information.  This is achieved through interviews and other forms of communication which help employees learn of their roles, and employers learn of their employees.  Effective communication here is vital as a person’s role within an organization can be very complicated if it involves many activities, or a person is managing multiple offices et cetera (Katz & Kahn 1978).  This seeking of information is vital to how we communicate in organizations today.

References

Katz, D & Kahn, RL 1978, The social psychology of organizations, 2^nd ed, Wiley, New York.

Miller, K 2009, Organizational communication: approaches and processes, 6th ed, Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.